data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2e36/f2e36542262d5a95f906ee59c0af69e12aaa6216" alt=""
Last Sunday night Sweetheart Vivienne and I watched, the 2-part
Australian Story titled ‘Something in the Water’. Originally screened on ABC TV last month, it can be streamed from here [
1,
2]. It’s about water pollution in north east Tasmania [
3]. I found it riveting – partly due to the focus and persistence of Drs Bleaney and Scammell. But much more so due to the nay saying – no, antipathy – by politicians and bureaucrats who have clearly lost sight of the fact that their only
raison d'être is to serve the Tasmanian public interest. I should’ve known better. I learnt the lesson years ago that politicians and bureaucrats march to a different drum. From 1996 when the first F1 Grand Prix [F1GP] was held in a subjugated Albert Park, it’s been obvious to the proverbial drover’s dog that the event in that location’s a triple-bottom-line disaster. And it always would be. Years ago Save Albert Park advocated a purpose-built state-of-the-art permanent venue. Our proposal fell on deaf political, bureaucratic and media ears. In fact it was met with scorn. Until now [
4]. Why the change? I don’t know; but 2010’s an election year. Of course now even a permanent venue’s anachronistic – because in this peak oil era, motor sport’s immoral and antisocial. In any event (pun intended) judging by this
Herald-Sun item [
5]
, you can’t rely on Premier Brumby or F1GP boss Walker (pictured) to make wise decisions in the public interest. I don’t.
1 comment:
Re the grand prix: this month's Monthly magazine has no GP ad.
Post a Comment